Does history express a person's emotion at a time ?

Hi everybody! Seeing you after a long time now! Today I am with a new topic.

Does history express a person's emotion at a time ?

I have seen many serials and films of mythology and history. They show an expression a person's emotion, it may be love, sadness, anger and manymore. We don't know what really happened. We don't know, two people may be friends or enemies. But how do these serials and films conclude, they were people with a particular lmentality.                                

                           The other thing is how did they find that people expressed their emotion in a particular way. For example, in case of depicting romance, the guys are always shown as proposing to the girls and the girls are shown as being shy and dodging all the time. Does the real person expressed like that ?? Who knows ???
Two examples for you which will make you understand still more

1) Siya ke Ram

This is a story of Ramayana mainly on the love story of goddess Sita and god Ram. In this the love scenes and fight and every scene 99% is full of imagination. In manuscripts the crisp summary of the story is given as phrases. Now I have a question how did they find how they expressed their emotion really??All imagination. Then how to know really how did lord Rama expressed his love to Sita?? Whom to believe and what to believe???

2) Chandra Nandini

           I have already written an article based on this serial. This serial is on the story of the king Chandragupta Maurya and his wife Nandini. First both were enemies and didn't like each other and they were forced to marry. As time passes they started liking each other and started loving each other. I wonder really, how did they find that a person called Nandini was there ?How they find how he shared or expressed his love ?? How did they find a person's perspective on an issue , his/her emotion and attitude ? I don't know if anybody knows, please tell me, I am confused.

FINALLY, I conclude by saying a moral, instead of a question . " Don't construe a person's attitude or mentality before you know about a person completely! " ( for the media )

                                                 
                                                             Yassasvinee Aravind
                                   

Mythology vs History

                
                       

Mythology vs History

      Mythological stories are very popular. Mythology is the collection of myths. Myths are traditional stories of the early people or tradition. This can be real or imaginary. This is carried by people for generation orally.

            

     

        History is different from mythology. It is the real story of the people. History should be real and no imagination stories can be called as history. Nowadays it became compulsary to learn history. It is like a story to listen and discuss partially but when you go deep it is as big as an ocean and difficult to understand it.

        Finally I conclude by saying " Is history and mythology same or different ?"

Is science and god one?

                        Is science and god one ?

                                    

              Certain people believe in god and certain people believe in science. Most people are in both the sides and I am in that category. I believe that there is some one who created the world and univerese but I don't know who it is. It may be god or science. Now we can see the descrription or perspective of the people on god and science.

 God :

                

God is the supreme person who created us and the whole world. With the belief of god religions started. The base 6 religions grew in India are Hindu, Buddism, Jainsm, Muslim, Sikhism and Christianity. In other regions of the world different religions grew. There are many saints who support and aware people to pray god. They describe god. There are saints before who we believe saw god. There was a Bhakthi movement in the history influencing praying god. Many worshipped form and idol worship and some worshiped formless god and supreme god worshiping. There are many poems and songs sung to solve the problems and believed that the problems are solved

    

     

Science :

 

 

Science is the nature or ourselves. Science is not a person or a thing or a animal or a bird. It is the total living organisms or nature. It doesn't have a form just like people worshipping formless god. Seeing something we feel it is great and its like someone has a power and does it but it is the cycle of nature.

Conclusion

We feel somebody is creating magic it may be god or science. But after so many discussion arise the same doubt " Is god and science  one ?"

Is history made with evidence or imagination?

         

                     Is history made of evidence or imagination?

                            History is story of the people lived in our past. We don't know exactly what happened in the past but we know them as phrases. But how do we know these ? We know these through some source of history. What are the sources of history?
Manuscripts
Inscriptions Archaeological evidence

and many more. But manuscripts and inscription does not give us right information because a person writes on the person's perspective. Archealogical evidences tell us the technologial, social ,cultural and describes their lifestyle.
Nowadays you may see serials and movies on history and mythological . We may enjoy it along it we have a doubt, how do they know the exact scene? These serials and films not only take from the sources of history also mix their imagination to it. It give us comedy, romance , fight and many more . It gives a taste to the programme. We like the imagination in the serial or movie. Although we know it is imagination we feel boaring without imagination. Do you agree with me ?
Finally we know serials are made of some imagination now I have a doubt "Do manuscripts and inscription tell the truth ?
                                                               Yassasvinee aravind

Is history real or fake

                  Is history real or fake ?

                       We don't know what really happened in history. There maybe fights, comedy, love, friendship, sorrow and many more . There are many serials and movies based on history. One of it is Chandra Nandini serial on the life of emperor Chandragupta Maurya and his wife Nandini.
           

In history Chandragupta had 2 wives they are Durdhara and Helana (daughter of Selucus). There was no character called Nandini. There are many similarities and differences between the serial and history. They are:
In the serial the father of Chandragupta Maurya was Suryagupta Maurya but in history it is said as Sarvarthasiddhi Maurya.

The mother of Chandragupta Maurya was Mura Maurya which is said in the serial and in history.

In the serial they say he thinks with his brain and never with his heart but there is no reference on this in history.

Chanakya was the mentor of Chandragupta Maurya( who everyone knows).

Chandragupta Maurya defeated Dhananda given in history but in the serial he defeated Mahapadmananda (father of Dhananda ).

Both the serial and history say Amatya Rakshasa is the chief minister of Nandas.

Both the serial and history say the king of Parvataka (the brother of Porus2 ) Vairochaka and his son Malayketu helped Nandas in the battle.

The first wife of Chandragupta Maurya is Durdhara(the daughter of his maternal uncle) in history but in the serial he first marries Helana (the daughter of selucus).

As said before Chandragupta Maurya had 2 wives said in history they are first Durdhara(the daughter of his maternal uncle) . He married her at a young age. Then after the death of Durdhara at a age of 40 he married Helana. He lives with her only for a few years .

But in the serial they say Helana is the first , Durdhara second and Nandini is third. Nandini is the daughter of Mahapadmananda and married Chandragupta Maurya on a compulsion. After few days they fall in love with each other.

Durdhara gave birth to Bindusara which is said in both history and in serial. Durdhara dies after giving birth to Bindusara These are the points I collected. Saying this I conclude by asking a question is history real or fake?

yassasvinee aravind